• Two port boats duck a starboard boat
  8 Comments
  Ken Jarrad Yesterday 20:51
• Time limit in Handicap Racing
  26 Comments
  Martin Fraser 26-Jan-19 20:47
• Three CV's on a long starting line
  11 Comments
  John Standley 26-Jan-19 12:58
• Pondering Rule 3 - Are Race Officers and Organizing Authorities Over-Reaching?
  64 Comments
  Beau Vrolyk 26-Jan-19 10:33
• Rule 18,2 (e) Reasonable Doubt
  12 Comments
  John Quirk 26-Jan-17 03:21

• Two port boats duck a starboard boat
  We use the term ‘elect to pass’. The leeward right of way boat, in this situation, could choose to pass the obstruction on either side. If she chooses to tack then she must make the call early enough to allow the windward boat to also tack. If she chooses to pass the obstruction by bearing away she is required to do that early enough and with enough space to allow the windward boat to also bear away to clear the obstruction in a seamanlike way.
  Ewan McEwan Today 04:50
• Pondering Rule 3 - Are Race Officers and Organizing Authorities Over-Reaching?
   Gordon Davies Created: Yesterday 13:39 ID: 20402: in my industry sector, in contracts drafting etc, tendency nowadays is to drop the usage of the word 'best' (more use: appropriate or diligently or such like)...such is the legal world today :)
  John Quirk Today 00:53
• Three CV's on a long starting line
  I've also used this mid-line "guide" buoy. On the one hand it works. On the other hand, the less experienced sailors basically get penalized for using the guide, and it backfired the last race after all the coaches finally told their kids: "if you're not out past that buoy, then you're late!"
  Niko Kotsatos Thu 15:35
• Rule 18,2 (e) Reasonable Doubt
  Thanks  Bob and an acute or sharp pencil scenario at that, and I would be inclined to agree with you. As such, to my original point, the leaning on this scenrio would be that we do in fact have a third standard of proof for a PC to consider (for 18.2 (e) and APPENDIX F).
   .
  John Quirk Thu 09:54
• Mark-Room and Room to Pass an Obstruction who wins.
  What a great Christmas Bonbon you gave us Mark! It's a Cracker!
  
  There have been many incredibly insightful comments but no agreed conclusion.
  
  Personally I like Jim's recent summary of "Angelo's interpretation" as it appears to be the fairest interpretation.
  
  To me, the underlying problem appears to be that the rules themselves are not 'deterministic' in this and some other situations. Ultimately, the rules alone should be sufficient. Cases may help but they should not be required.
  
  
  David Taylor Thu 01:11

Forums Leader Board

This Month