I’ve noticed multiple incidents during racing where boats clearly infringe the rules—whether it’s mark-room, port-starboard, or right-of-way situations—and yet very few hearing requests are being filed afterward. Sailing is a self-policing sport, and the protest system exists to ensure fairness and proper rule enforcement. So why are competitors hesitant to use it?
Is it a lack of understanding of the protest process? A perception that filing a protest is “unsportsmanlike”? Fear of conflict or retribution? Or something else entirely?
Would having judges walk the docks before racing help?
For example, their presence might make the process feel more approachable, allow sailors to ask questions informally, and encourage legitimate protests to be filed when needed.
I’d love to hear perspectives from sailors, judges, and race organizers on what’s driving the low number of hearings and what actions could improve rule adherence and competitor confidence in the system.
Further, I am of the opinion that Judges walking in the park, in a pair though, is definitely a constructive activity. It gives an informal environment to the sailors to approach and interact with the judges. The sailors do have many questions but are not sure when and where to interact with the judges. This walk in the park will encourage sailors interaction with judges and have a positive effect on the competitor's confidence on the system.
The easiest example I can think of is a starting line in a large fleet. If you watch, rule 11 is broken so many times, yet seldom is a flag seen. Why? Because it's just the way it is. Likewise for tight mark rounding.
When it does matter to the boats involved, you definitely will see a protest result.
And there’s the fact that, no matter how right the protestor may be, once in ‘the room’, one’s chances are 50/50 of favorable outcome.
As far as judges walking the docks, presumably to encourage lodging protests, that would greatly detract from the reasons my friends and I race together.
In my recent red-flag thread, I wrote this comment about times when invalidity seems ridiculous to the parties ... which I think is part of it.
At the heart of that thread is the same issue as this one: Lack of even rules enforcement across the race course. A disrespected protest-system is only one brick in that wall.
Many, many years ago, I wrote a very long post that tried to examine what I saw as some of the other root causes; some of which i saw as internal in nature to the competitor. It was titled:
“I owe you one”, “Was MY score effected?”, “Not-Worthiness” and “Stigma”; Four Mindsets Eroding Fair-Sailing in Club-Level Racing.
My thesis (and it seems Robert's in this thread) hasn't changed since I wrote it. These factors, and the impression that the protest process isn't worth the time and effort, result in the rules applying to some but not others on the water resulting in an uneven playing field.
There is no problem if a competitor breaks a rule. Everybody does it. There is a problem if a competitor breaks a rule on purpose and/or he or she doesn't get a penalty for the breach.
Robert, thank you very much for opening this discussion, the matter concerns me a lot as well. Even thought, I think the main problem isn't having many infringements and few hearings, rather, having many infringements and such few penalties taken or given.
Many years ago, my first sailing coach was preparing me for my first Regatta, and the first rule he taught was that I could and should penalise myself for a breach. It was an honor issue. Now, we see coaches teaching theirs kids ways of brealing the rules without getting caught.